<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attention Sugar House: You&#8217;re About To Get Screwed Again (Update 1: Email Address)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://saintless.com/2008/09/09/attention-sugar-house-youre-about-to-get-screwed-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://saintless.com/2008/09/09/attention-sugar-house-youre-about-to-get-screwed-again/</link>
	<description>Because politics matter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 02:18:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: saintless</title>
		<link>http://saintless.com/2008/09/09/attention-sugar-house-youre-about-to-get-screwed-again/comment-page-1/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>saintless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saintless.wordpress.com/?p=576#comment-389</guid>
		<description>Bob, I can&#039;t attest to the old K-Mart&#039;s building status, other than I know it&#039;s there. Replacing it with a Wal-Mart would not at all be a benefit to the community.

The traffic changes that Wal-Mart would bring would change the face of Sugar House as it is today. There&#039;s already a big box store in the neighborhood, though in a better position close to the freeway, which minimizes traffic impact. A second one is not needed.

And more importantly, the small, local businesses would suffer greatly if a Wal-Mart were put in.

I&#039;m sure there are much better ways to get less asphalt, and more greenery in that area than to allow Wal-Mart to put their claws in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob, I can&#8217;t attest to the old K-Mart&#8217;s building status, other than I know it&#8217;s there. Replacing it with a Wal-Mart would not at all be a benefit to the community.</p>
<p>The traffic changes that Wal-Mart would bring would change the face of Sugar House as it is today. There&#8217;s already a big box store in the neighborhood, though in a better position close to the freeway, which minimizes traffic impact. A second one is not needed.</p>
<p>And more importantly, the small, local businesses would suffer greatly if a Wal-Mart were put in.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure there are much better ways to get less asphalt, and more greenery in that area than to allow Wal-Mart to put their claws in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://saintless.com/2008/09/09/attention-sugar-house-youre-about-to-get-screwed-again/comment-page-1/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 23:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saintless.wordpress.com/?p=576#comment-390</guid>
		<description>Actually, as much as I hate Wal*Mart, I have to disagree with you on this one.

First, the KMART is still there.

Second, the building is not &quot;perfectly good&quot; as WALMART Watch says.  The building has been falling apart for years.

Third, they are basically replacing one big box for annother.

Fourth, The new plan calls for a building of roughly the same size, but less asphalt and more trees and grass than ezist now.

-Bob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, as much as I hate Wal*Mart, I have to disagree with you on this one.</p>
<p>First, the KMART is still there.</p>
<p>Second, the building is not &#8220;perfectly good&#8221; as WALMART Watch says.  The building has been falling apart for years.</p>
<p>Third, they are basically replacing one big box for annother.</p>
<p>Fourth, The new plan calls for a building of roughly the same size, but less asphalt and more trees and grass than ezist now.</p>
<p>-Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
